Spite Hate Mail: Regarding our article about Evolution Not only did you never actually critique the rant I sent you (I mean come on, it wasn't THAT bad...) but this last update blew. I'm personally insulted. Like you care, I know. Jill's piece was uninteresting, unfunny, and didn't even seem spiteful. I mean it's ok to make stupid, nonsensical suggestions like releasing wild animals to weed out the shitty people, which of course wouldn't help anybody, if it at least the stupid piece was presented in an entertaining way. I could overlook the obvious logical flaws of her ideas if I thought they were being spouted off in a true hysterical tantrum, or if I actually thought the piece was funny, but the whole thing has a horribly forced, pompous, condascending, overplanned feel and has no true rage or insight or anything. It's just stooooopid. Yeah, I'm sure that last comments is helping my cause. AND THEN A LETTER FROM HER TOO? I don't get it... was this whole update just so Bradford could make obnoxious comments to her? Well if it was then I'm cool with it but otherwise I want my money back. Adam Well, I thought the Darwin piece was funny enough to make up for it not making sense logically. As for her letter, well we'll publish anything we get. Case in point.
You can also go to the front page of Spite, Or check out the old mail. |